XX: The inherent truth of this reality is that something is beyond the works of what you all might percieve as a full universe.
XX: That means, this initiative is organized because something has to be happening above and beyond the scenes of our world.
XX: That truth is that something previously presented as fictitious, would actually just be the result of a strange metatext.
XX: Because as you know, the Author has begun a movement to rewrite his definition of canonity, as if to smudge the border between our reality and that of the story.
XX: And I'm sorry, not to make things more meta than they need to be, but that's all the result of our own exposition here. Simply put, one where the lines are actually quite blurred, and instead run in an infinitive fashion.
XX: Where the text is directly responsible for the "story" but in turn that story is directly responsible for our own existence here.
XX: As ridiculous as it sounds, it can't be proven wrong when it's presented as just a fragment of a bizarre self-sustaining story.
XX: Because by your own argument, reality isn't the type to follow any glitzy, romanticized tropes anyway, right? How very ironic.
